home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- 001:Subject: comp.std.unix Volume 11 [Reposting. -mod]
- 002:Subject: Submission for comp-std-unix
- 003:Subject: Why getpwent but not putpwent?
- 004:Subject: Access to UNIX-Related Standards
- 005:Subject: Access to UNIX-Related Standards
- 006:Subject: new directory library
- 007:Subject: alias problem fixed
- 008:Subject: tar or cpio?
- 009:Subject: Re: tar or cpio?
- 010:Subject: Re: tar or cpio?
- 011:Subject: tar or cpio?
- 012:Subject: tar or cpio?
- 013:Subject: tar or cpio? N.043
- 014:Subject: tar or cpio? N.048
- 015:Subject: tar or cpio? N.064
- 016:Subject: Re: tar or cpio?
- 017:Subject: Re: tar or cpio? Tar, of course.
- 018:Subject: IEEE 1003.1 Rationale and Notes
- 019:Subject: Re: tar or cpio? Tar, of course!
- 020:Subject: tar on RT11 v4
- 021:Subject: Re: tar or cpio?
- 022:Subject: Re: tar or cpio?
- 023:Subject: Re: tar or cpio? Tar, of course!
- 024:Subject: Re: tar or cpio? Tar, of course!
- 025:Subject: Re: tar and cpio
- 026:Subject: Re: tar or cpio? Tar, of course!
- 026:Subject: Re: tar or cpio? Tar, of course!
- 027:Subject: Re: tar or cpio? Tar, of course.
- 028:Subject: Re: tar stop at mount points
- 029:Subject: Access to UNIX-Related Standards
- 030:Subject: Re: Access to UNIX-Related Standards
- 031:Subject: Re: Access to UNIX-Related Standards
- 032:Subject: Re: tar stop at mount points
- 033:Subject: Access to UNIX User Groups and Publications
- 034:Subject: Re: tar or cpio?
- 035:Subject: Re: tar stop at mount points
- 036:Subject: More tar/cpio
- 037:Subject: cpio inode number limit is too low
- 038:Subject: state of unix standards
- 039:Subject: Re: tar or cpio?
- 040:Subject: Re: More tar/cpio
- 041:Subject: tar vs. cpio
- 042:Subject: Re: tar or cpio?
- 043:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 044:Subject: Re: More tar/cpio
- 045:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 046:Subject: Re: More tar/cpio
- 047:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 048:Subject: Re: tar or cpio?
- 049:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 050:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 051:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 052:Subject: USENIX, standards BOF
- 053:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 054:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 055:Subject: UNIX Facilities for Interpreters
- 056:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 057:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 058:Subject: Access to UNIX-Related Standards
- 059:Subject: Re: USENIX, standards BOF
- 060:Subject: POSIX Portability Workshop
- 061:Subject: <limits.h> - copy of item posted to comp.unix.wizards
- 062:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 063:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 064:Subject: open file range
- 065:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 066:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 067:Subject: tar vs. cpio
- 068:Subject: Re: UNIX Facilities for Interpreters
- 069:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 070:Subject: Re: <limits.h> - copy of item posted to comp.unix.wizards
- 071:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 072:Subject: Re: UNIX Facilities for Interpreters
- 073:Subject: Replacement for signals in POSIX?
- 074:Subject: Re: open file range
- 075:Subject: Re: open file range
- 076:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 077:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 078:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 079:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 080:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 081:Subject: Re: Replacement for signals in POSIX?
- 082:Subject: POSIX Portability Workshop
- 083:Subject: Killing programs that close(-1)
- 084:Subject: Re: UNIX Facilities for Interpreters
- 085:Subject: Widely used tools on various hosts
- 086:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 087:Subject: Re: a new? topic - dynamic loading
- 088:Subject: POSIX Portability Workshop
- 089:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 090:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 091:Subject: Re: tar vs. cpio
- 092:Subject: End of Volume 11
-